|
"Five Monkeys, Not Three" (SCOTUS seeing, speaking and hearing no "evil") Not just three monkeys; but five we'd cashier. Scalia won't read, Clarence won't speak, They're just two of the five who also can't hear. As Orwell predicted, fascism is here In the form of five monkeys, not three, Who have ruled NASA is free and clear To snoop and spy indiscriminately. Biased rulings? Of course. How could they be otherwise? When they knew the outcome before they started, There's no way their judgement could be a surprise. Seeing and hearing nothing at all That they disagree with that could change their mind? Asking no questions? The result's preordained. How could they be less than five of a kind? Lazy Scalia needn't take the time reading Any material that he finds disgusting? Clarence won't embarrass himself by speaking? Have we enough 3-in-1 oil? SCOTUS is rusting. ************ Instead of three monkeys, there are five domineering. Scalia won't read; Clarence won't question; But can all five monkeys be that hard of hearing?
Bob Carlson challenge FISA eavesdropping law' To 'Supreme Court says FISA spying is 'none of our business'' To 'Bushie's Snooping Policy in Rhymed Verse' To 'First Indiscriminatory Snarks Act in Rhymed Verse' To 'More Lazy Scalia in Rhymed Verse' |