Koch Parties vs. Tea Parties
Selling naming rights

The U.S. isn't Britain. We drink more cokes than tea.
Tea sounds elitist. Coke sounds more robust.
Holding a can of coke? Folks use five fingers.
Holding a cup of tea? Your pinkie's nonplussed.

What 'Nancy' came up with the 'Tea Party' name.
'Koch Party'? Now that has a much more masculine ring
Not quite as macho perhaps as beer party.
But call it 'Koch Party' and they'll fund the whole thing.

Naming rights really are all David is after.
He'll buy whatever just to put his name on it,
Unlike Rupert Murdoch who'll malign it until
You come to him with no choice but to pawn it.

Anything to make money. That's Rupert's mantra.
For a while hacking cellphones seemed a very fine way.
But selling the naming rights to his Wall Street Journal?
The Koch Street Journal plugs Koch City's Ballet…

Now Sara Palin wants in on the action.
Pay more than Murdoch and she'll change her name
To David H. Koch when she becomes president.
So how many million to become Auntie Mame?

Bob Carlson
www.politicalboondoggles.com
On Twitter @PBoondoggles
9/13/10

To 'Billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama'
To 'Koch brothers give $1M
       to try to suspend California global warming law'

To 'The Billionaires Bankrolling the Tea Party'
To 'The Billionaire's Party'
To 'A Grassroots Movement Built by a Bunch of Billionaires
       Out to Destroy Progressivism'

To 'Secretive Koch Donors'
To 'The malign influence of Rupert Murdoch'
To 'Tabloid Hack Attack on Royals, and Beyond'
To 'Murdoch's Monopolies'