|
Naïve, But Activist (Chief Justice Roberts et al.) How very naïve of Roberts and Kennedy To think partisan donors would ever own up And admit that they've paid to get Angle elected. Not all donor wives have signed a prenup. Kennedy writes that with full disclosure There's no need to limit what donors can give, Nor who the donors and recipients are… But Karl Rove to O'Donnell? Why live and let live? Unless the POTUS steps into the breach, Secretly sanctioning IRS leaks. It's prob'ly too late to do much for his midterms But look for some great post-election critiques. Consider the impact of this activist court. Incumbents who find they are being out-spent Are often the ones who have been there too long And, like Mitch Just-Say-No, past the age of consent. So what will this activist court do for encores? From within their own ranks, a spouse and wife team? No… When Roberts divorces, he'll wed a gay brother Fulfilling a social conservative's dream.
Bob Carlson 10/30/10 To 'Roberts Court rulings on campaign finance reveal shifting makeup, forceful role' To 'Secretive Koch Donors' To 'The Messiah from Nevada' To 'Karl Rove: Christine O'Donnell said 'nutty things' To 'Lobbyist Karl Rove' To 'Mitch Just-Say-No' To 'Scalia's Court' To 'The Battle Cry of a Supreme Court Wife' To 'Ginni Thomas's SCOTUS Lobby' |