|
Scalia's Legal Money Laundering (Tax-exempt contributions; identities hidden) "Justice" Scalia says he couldn't be prouder Of what his own interpretations have shown. He very much doubts that Bork could have done better, You think maybe Bork has advised him by phone? How else could Concerned Taxpayers of America Be buying attack ads to deny climate change? Their website doesn't try to collect contributions. That isn't just weird. That's exceedingly strange, Unless the Koch billionaires don't need our money. To buy TV time to play with our brains. Do they really believe that we're all that childish And like "Frank Haynes" won't come in when it rains? Now Scalia's opinion keeps Koch laundries secret So no one will know who is laundering whose. For laundering dubious campaign contributions Makes reputations that much harder to lose. Does Koch want New York City Ballet devotees To know he is funding extremist Christines? Now, thanks to Bork and "Justice" Scalia, He gives to laundries that won't spill his beans.
Bob Carlson 10/3/10 To 'Supreme Court Decision Encourages Money-Laundering' To 'DeFazio takes on the astroturfers' To 'Hidden Under Tax-Exempt Cloak, Political Dollars Flow' To 'Scalia's Court' To 'Billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama' To 'The Billionaire's Party' To 'Secretive Koch Donors' To 'Christine O'Donnell: "I Dabbled Into Witchcraft"' To 'Profile: Robert Bork"' |