Why Hire A Loser?

(Mitt's Rich Sugar Daddies must have dough to blow)

Even Karl Rove is thinking they have not hired a winner.
Oh, Mitt did well for himself when his tax deck was stacked,
But keeping it stacked requires more than a spinner
Of fiction. Credibility's a trait that Mitt's sorely lacked.

Why'd they hire a frontman who most doubt believes
Whatever he's saying or what he has up his sleeves,
Whether it has any meaning or's another dumb joke
That nothing's as refreshing as a self-righteous Koch?

Most are aware that if the Koch boys wore skirts.
It would be hard to tell which one was more like Ayn Rand.
And, if you suggest it, they would cry that though that hurts
They won't be affected at all if contraception is banned.

Not the way Mitt would be, like he'd see that gets passed…
How many more Romney's will Sugar Daddies support?
When he loses, those Romneys could multiply pretty fast:
Time on his hands and more young new Mormon wives
    with whom to cavort.

Bob Carlson
www.politicalboondoggles.com
4/27/12

To 'Karl Rove: Obama Poised For Electoral Triumph'
To 'Sugar Daddies - The old, white, rich men who are buying this election.'
To 'The Inequity of Private-equity Hustlers'
To 'Romney Holds Big-Money Fundraiser at N.Y. Billionaire’s Townhouse'
To 'Embracing Karl Rove, Sheldon Adelson Goes Stealth'
To 'Romney’s Magical Capitalism'
To 'Ryan Shrugged'
To 'Koch Political Pawns Verses'
To 'Paul Ryan's Etch A Sketch Romney Verses'
To 'Mitt's Money Machines Verses'